What are PEPs?
The Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement (SECURE) Act of 2019 and the subsequent Securing a Strong Retirement Act of 2022 (SECURE 2.0) established the most meaningful (and often misunderstood) retirement plan legislation in 15 years. Among the many provisions enacted by these laws, one that may have the most momentous impact on the retirement industry is the creation of the Pooled Employer Plan (PEP), effective January 1, 2021.1
PEPs allow for multiple unrelated employers of various sizes to participate in a single retirement plan. Regardless of the total number of participating employers, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) considers a PEP as a single, unique 401(k) plan with one 5500, one audit and one ERISA bond.2 The PEP allows all employers to band together under one third party (the Pooled Plan Provider or PPP) to offer a competitive retirement savings vehicle.1 While delegating the day-to-day administration and fiduciary liabilities to the PPP, the employer can keep autonomy over plan design such as employer contributions, eligibility and distribution options.
We believe this innovative plan structure can allow for significant economies of scale, streamlined plan administration, lower potential fiduciary exposure and a decreased need for employer resources. All of these factors can result in improved participant outcomes.
Cost Savings
The biggest litigation risk to an employer who sponsors a retirement plan is excessive fee claims. By merging the retirement assets of many employers into a single plan, employers have the ability to access investment management, administrative and recordkeeping services on a lower-cost basis than what would be available under a standalone employer plan. Since all of the employers in the PEP share the same investment vehicles, recordkeeper, advisors and administrator, the negotiated fee savings can be significant. Another benefit to pooling assets may be the ability for employers to access low-cost collective investment trust (CITs). Some single employer plans may not have the required assets to meet prohibitive minimums for CITs, yet the pooling of assets under one plan can help alleviate this challenge.
Similarly, pooling employer assets may offer cost savings for plan audits. Audit costs to employers have only increased over the years and since the IRS only requires a single audit, all of the employers share this reduced cost as well.
Administrative Efficiencies
The Pooled Plan Provider’s role is to serve as the 3(16) operational fiduciary for the PEP. The function of a 3(16) fiduciary centers around the administration of the retirement plan.3 These functions include tracking employee eligibility, managing and approving all plan distributions, maintaining required plan information and plan documents, fulfilling reporting requirements and furnishing the required disclosures to all plan participants and beneficiaries.4
Under a single plan model, failure to accurately complete these administrative responsibilities can have costly consequences. In the PEP, since the administrative liability is outsourced to the PPP, employers are relieved of most of these operational duties. The employer’s primary responsibility shifts to providing accurate payroll information to the PPP and timely contributions to the retirement plan. This structure allows the third-party administrative experts to handle the day-to-day running of the retirement plan and can minimize the potential for costly errors.4
Reduced Fiduciary Risk
Given the increasing litigation related to excessive fees and investment imprudence, the ability to offload such risks has gained greater importance. A key benefit of a PEP lies in the ability to transfer a significant portion of fiduciary responsibility and liability to the PPP. Because the PPP takes on the 3(16) administrative duty for the day-to-day operations, it bears the responsibility for any operational errors as long as the employer has followed its role in providing accurate payroll and timely contributions.4
The PPP is also responsible for the engagement of a 3(38) investment fiduciary which oversees selecting, managing, monitoring and benchmarking the investment offerings.4 While no plan structure can completely eliminate all fiduciary duties and these third parties must be closely monitored, PEPs provide a means to delegate many of the responsibilities and potentially alleviate fiduciary risk.
Fewer Employer Resources Needed
Numerous businesses face challenges in dedicating time, required technology or necessary infrastructure for effective retirement administration and oversight. Some employers decide against offering a plan at all because of the significant resource burden. To tackle this issue, PEPs offer a “do it for you” approach which operates with the PPP managing tasks such as administration, monitoring and reporting.
This means employers are relieved of time-consuming responsibilities like plan setup, coordination with vendors, employee enrollment and the intricate aspects of 401(k) plan management and governance.
Employers allow the PPP to oversee these tasks but retain control over aspects like defining matching levels, setting contribution limits and ensuring that the plan aligns with their employees’ needs. While some employers may prefer a more hands-on approach, many employers recognize the benefits of a plan that can run efficiently with minimal operational involvement.
Deciding if a PEP is the Right Alternative for You
Fiducient Advisors can assist employers in addressing the question of whether or not a PEP would be an appropriate benefit for their employees, instead of a standalone plan. Our consultants can review considerations such as plan size, current organizational structure, existing resources and technology to help employers decide if the PEP is indeed a solution for their retirement plan offering.
Additionally, Fiducient Advisors established a PEP with Newport/Ascensus serving as the PPP. Our firm provides the 3(38) discretionary services and fiduciary consulting for PEP clients. Our goal in establishing the PEP is to offer our clients another option so that they can choose the most beneficial retirement plan structure for their employees. Please contact Tyler Polk or any of the consultants at Fiducient Advisors to discuss any questions or for assistance in determining if joining the PEP is the right fit for your organization.
[1] Source: The National Law Review. PEPs and MEPs: Compliance and Fiduciary Considerations Under the SECURE Act. July 20, 2021.
[2] Source: Ropes & Gray, Pools Employer Plans (“PEPs”): Putting a little PEP in a 401K retirement plan could help to protect your Portfolio Companies. April 19, 2022
[3] Source: The National Law Review. PEPs and MEPs: Compliance and Fiduciary Considerations Under the SECURE Act. July 20, 2021.
[4] Source: Ropes & Gray, Pools Employer Plans (“PEPs”): Putting a little PEP in a 401K retirement plan could help to protect your Portfolio Companies. April 19, 2022
The information contained herein is confidential and the dissemination or distribution to any other person without the prior approval of Fiducient Advisors is strictly prohibited. Information has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, though not independently verified. Any forecasts are hypothetical and represent future expectations and not actual return volatilities and correlations will differ from forecasts. This report does not represent a specific investment recommendation. The opinions and analysis expressed herein are based on Fiducient Advisor research and professional experience and are expressed as of the date of this report. Please consult with your advisor, attorney and accountant, as appropriate, regarding specific advice. Past performance does not indicate future performance and there is risk of loss.